<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Media Minute 04.07.08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daisywhitney.com/new-media-minute-040708/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daisywhitney.com/new-media-minute-040708/</link>
	<description>Contributing Writer for TVWEEK</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Walker</title>
		<link>http://daisywhitney.com/new-media-minute-040708/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daisywhitney.com/new-media-minute-040708/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this... it contradicts what I understood about youtube ads... glad to hear it.! It still remains true, I think, that the "partners" agreement has a gag clause preventing anyone from disclosing how much they make as youtube partner.

That's not very evil in the evil scheme of things... 
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this&#8230; it contradicts what I understood about youtube ads&#8230; glad to hear it.! It still remains true, I think, that the &#8220;partners&#8221; agreement has a gag clause preventing anyone from disclosing how much they make as youtube partner.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not very evil in the evil scheme of things&#8230;<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
